In Reply to: Ya, that may be. posted by TheHappyBurgermeister on January 21, 2026 at 17:41:51
It's an interesting question/dilemma. Legally, and contractually, it might be smart and right. But in practical terms, what does making him stay mean? Does the kid basically perform poorly on the field (if he gets on the field), miss receivers intentionally, fumble hand-offs, etc., just to punish Puke for making him stay? Or does he suck it up, realize that tanking his performance on the field will negatively impact his draftability and future income, and play his best?
It will definitely be interesting to see how this plays out.