Wouldn’t the stronger case of election inter…

… ference be Trump’s collaboration with Pecker on the false claims of Cruz’s father’s link to the Kennedy assassination?

The REASON for the coverup on Stormy and others may be more difficult to prove as it pertains to linking it specifically to election interference. Covering up something that DID happen.

In the Cruz situation, it was a made up story, and known to be made up at the time of publication. Seems like a no-brainer to me.

Follow Ups:

• You have no clue what this case is even about DCfan 11:15:45 04/25/24 (2)
  • Irony Alert! Dr.J 11:35:27 04/25/24 (0)
  • What a Fox-based, whacko MAGA like yourself thinks… Fuzzy 11:24:42 04/25/24 (0)
• I suspect it would be a harder case to make that blindness 09:12:48 04/25/24 (2)
  • Interesting, though states have a vested interest… Fuzzy 09:23:38 04/25/24 (1)
    • I'm thinking more in terms of parties being private blindness 09:31:48 04/25/24 (0)
• Not illegal to lie hjbruin 08:35:45 04/25/24 (1)
  • If the intent of the lie is election interference… Fuzzy 08:38:36 04/25/24 (0)
• The issue here, as I understand it, is the falsification of . . . BluBlood 08:14:26 04/25/24 (2)
  • That makes sense, if there is no evidence of … Fuzzy 08:35:25 04/25/24 (1)
    • I think it's pretty simple: For Nat'l Inq, Trump is . . BluBlood 10:41:39 04/25/24 (0)

Post a Followup