In Reply to: You're fitting your wants onto a made up agenda posted by HarborCityBruin on February 24, 2024 at 20:05:49
You're arguing against your own hallucinations, not against me or any version of reality.
I can't read minds, but based upon this post, I can see a bit of the picture you're carrying around in your head and it looks like a cartoon, a fantasy that you have uncritically superimposed on events.
Uscher's resignation is not a positive indication. It suggests disarray and probably had something to do with money. Perhaps his budget was cut, so fewer resources from Jarmond for recruiting.
If that's what happened, one might question Jarmond's leadership and commitment to better recruiting. It also, if true, shows him as a completely disingenuous flim flam man since he loudly proclaimed Foster would get all the resources he needed. Well, money is the resource he needs. Not SB rings, not passion, not being a Bruin. Money.
If he cut the recruiting budget in some way causing Uscher to leave, then he isn't to be trusted.
The proof will be in the pudding. If there is less money for recruiting from Ucla and from NIL, there will be no generalized recruiting success.
As for EB, there is no way to know what he will do here. His past has little to do with what his Ucla future will look like. Andy Reid called the plays, EB carried the clipboard. Take the words "Patrick Mahomes" of his resume, and what do you have? Only time will tell.
I hope Schlee doesn't transfer.