Re: I'll defend Jarmond


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Football Forum ]

Posted by SehornBlew on February 13, 2024 at 13:55:38

In Reply to: I'll defend Jarmond posted by Starbucks on February 13, 2024 at 13:28:50

Nothing that Dr said above is wrong. I don’t really care about his self promotion. I was disappointed about UCLA’s losing its only D1 football schedule. I thought it was silly to ruin it. PS, don’t buy the Michigan nailed on us so we couldn’t fill it with a D1 opponent. Teams cancel games w/in a year and backfill. It was a decision to play 2 HBCU games. But each of us is peeved about different things.

Jarmonds decision making wrt chip Kelly’s contract is his most egregious error. Both extensions were unnecessary, but the 2nd one was the height of incompetence and it really acrewed us. I won’t repeat it, I’ve written too many posts on it, so if you care or haven’t read go find them.

You’re all wet re icla to the 10.

The Big 10 didn’t care AT ALL about ucla hoops. Zero. The entire media rights package for hoops was 35m/yr. ONE GAME of college football was valued at 35mm/. Hoops was as important to the 10 as ladies lax. Regular season College hoop is just just sports tv filler. TBF The NBA is having issues too. We live in a football world.

Has ucla had a single full house at Laukey this year? I think Bolch said max attendance this year was a hair over 9k.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Email:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Football Forum ]