in the super slo-mo you can say

In Reply to: It was "probably" the right call, BUT no way was... posted by Fuzzy on February 07, 2010 at 18:52:34

there was possession, because he came to a stop with his hands around the ball....BUT IN REAL LIFE, when they showed exactly ONE REAL TIME view...there was no way you could claim that he IRRIFUTABLY (sp?) had possession. The whole thing went by in less than the blink of an eye. The ref was right on top of it, and was emphatic about what he saw....if there was possession it was for less than a nano-second. It was a bs call.

Follow Ups:

• The Zabruder film clearly shows he pushed the ball bruinfanintheIE 14:20:07 02/08/10 (0)
• I think I saw the ball stabilize right before it got kicked off LBB 21:14:49 02/07/10 (10)
  • The odd thing it seemed to me NorthBruin40 08:23:23 02/08/10 (9)
    • I could be wrong but when the ball crosses the plane bruinfan13 11:31:58 02/08/10 (8)
      • Possession is the only issue UCLABB 12:41:17 02/08/10 (5)
        • Isn't the fact that so many are "refuting" it here an indication... Fuzzy 14:06:19 02/08/10 (3)
          • When the Colts argue about it... UCLABB 14:49:13 02/08/10 (2)
            • Isn't the standard meant to be a ''football move?'' SuperBruinMan 17:28:10 02/08/10 (1)
              • The announcers said "hit the ground with possession." OldBruin 15:48:35 02/09/10 (0)
        • Thanks* bruinfan13 12:55:14 02/08/10 (0)
      • That's correct JystinTym 11:39:10 02/08/10 (1)
        • thanks* bruinfan13 12:55:51 02/08/10 (0)
• Agreed. And I was pulling hard for the Saints* TheHappyBurgermeister 21:10:57 02/07/10 (0)

Post a Followup