In Reply to: No mention of Jarmond? Foster is the sideshow. * posted by BluBlood on September 13, 2025 at 21:26:16
And then there is the Athletic Director, the architect not of triumph but of rubble, the man who mistook stewardship for slow-motion sabotage. His dismissal, too, would be a relief—a deliverance from the administrator who drove the program into the ground while congratulating himself on the elegance of the crater. What is an athletic department if not a command post? What is an Athletic Director if not a general of generals? Instead, UCLA has endured a bureaucrat of budgets, a manager of decline, a curator of mediocrity. Remove him, and perhaps the program might rediscover its will to fight, its very appetite for victory. Relief again—this time for the institution itself, which deserves leadership instead of ledger sheets.