Nope. But that didn't get too much attention. Did it?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Football Forum ]

Posted by Deplorable on May 04, 2025 at 10:47:31

In Reply to: Didn’t the new Chancellor extend Jarmond? posted by ThunderRoad on May 04, 2025 at 08:49:52

No. The F'ing snake Jarmond extended himself while the throne was empty. His extension was approved in November 2024 by interim chancellor Darnell Hunt. That was after Block left but before Frenk arrived.

In this lightly publicized by critically informative empty throne palace coup, Jarmond showed us his true skills: Naked career opportunism and exploiting the political climate prevalent in academia. He's demonstrated no ability to manage our program. He has no talent other than weaving his way through a gummed up place like Ucla.

Jarmond is cheating us of what we deserve: A competitive and thriving football program.

We need to get him and his ilk at Morgan Center away from the football team if it's ever going to thrive. We need to have a non-profit, private organization run the team. It could be staffed with non-Ucla talent. Florida State, Univ. of Kentucky, BYU and many other programs are already managed this way using a 501(c)(3) tax exempt non-profit organization.

We need to pull the Bruins away from these cancerous bureaucrats while we still can. With $200mm in debt and the peak in tv rights fees in sight, Ucla will be forced to end programs or turn them over to a capable, private organization.

Jarmond's shrinking away from the exciting new business of college football, his lack of managerial skill, his lack of marketing talent and executive leadership ability have caused, and will continue to cause Bruin football to suffer. Enough is enough. Dispatch this useless salary sucker and get on with rebuilding the Bruins.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Email:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Football Forum ]