Yes


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Basketball Forum ]

Posted by MMiller on June 12, 2017 at 19:50:51

In Reply to: No* posted by UCLABB on June 12, 2017 at 18:54:22

Alford was given a contract extension of a year for $3.5 million.

He canceled it. So, he cost himself $3.5 million.

What does "no" mean?

Do you mean he didn't return money that had already been paid to him? That would be true, but irrelevant to UCLA now having $3.5 million available to spend on something else and Alford being $3.5 million poorer, his contract ending sooner and his buy-out being reduced as well.





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
Email:
Password:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Follow Up ] [ UCLA Basketball Forum ]